STenergy logoSTenergyEnergy Technology
Open menu
Technologies

Technology portfolio for field applications.

STenergy technologies focus on hydraulic fracturing, proppant transport, multiphase flow, reservoir optimization, and field implementation.
Technical Focus

Applied oilfield technology areas

Technology records are maintained in the Admin Dashboard and can be selectively displayed on the public Technologies page or the access-controlled Patents page.

Hydraulic fracturing

Fracture-Surface Morphology Analysis and Upscaling Prediction for Post-Fracturing Conductivity Using 3D Laser Scanning

This study develops a quantitative workflow for evaluating how post-fracturing surface morphology affects fracture conductivity. Representative shale fracture surfaces are classified as bedding-related, mirror-like hydraulic, step-like, or reactivated structural fractures. High-resolution 3D laser scanning is used to obtain surface point clouds and calculate Ra, Rq, and Rz roughness parameters, together with scale-dependent roughness behavior and a two-dimensional box-counting fractal dimension.

The results show that bedding-related and step-like fractures generally have stronger surface undulation and geometric complexity than smoother mirror-like fractures. Saturation-type functions describe the evolution of roughness with measurement scale, and the Hill function provides flexible fitting for heterogeneous surfaces. The study then proposes a morphology-aware upscaling framework that connects roughness, contact behavior, equivalent hydraulic aperture, and stress-sensitive conductivity.

ARMA 26-0068, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0068
Technical Problem Solved
Conventional conductivity models often represent fractures as smooth, parallel surfaces with a single ideal aperture. That assumption does not capture the roughness, anisotropy, contact zones, steps, and directional features observed in post-fracturing cores. This work provides a measurable 3D morphology workflow and an upscaling concept for translating core-scale surface data into more realistic conductivity assessment.
Application Area
Post-fracturing core evaluation; fracture conductivity prediction; digital-rock and surface-morphology analysis; stress-sensitive fracture assessment; stimulation diagnostics for shale, tight sandstone, coal-bearing, and other unconventional reservoirs.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Hydraulic fracturing

Experimental Evaluation of Proppant Size Combinations under Oil-Bearing Fracture Conditions: Fracture Conductivity and NMR-Based Fluid Occupancy

This paper evaluates proppant blends for oil-bearing fractures that may be reopened during shale-oil refracturing. Artificially split shale cores were packed with 20/40, 40/70, and 70/140 mesh proppants in single-size and mixed-size combinations. Conductivity was measured under crude-oil and fracturing-fluid flow, while NMR T2 analysis was used to evaluate residual water, residual oil, and movable-oil behavior within the propped fracture system.

Coarse-dominated packs generally preserve larger flow channels and provide higher fracture conductivity. Mixed-size packs do not always maximize conductivity, but they can improve fluid redistribution and movable-oil saturation. The 40/70:20/40 = 5:5 blend provides a practical balance between conductivity and fluid occupancy, while a three-stage mixed-size blend shows an advantage in promoting oil-phase mobility. The results support multi-objective proppant optimization rather than conductivity-only ranking.

ARMA 26-0073, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0073
Technical Problem Solved
Proppant selection for refracturing is often based mainly on single-phase conductivity, even though reopened fractures may contain both pre-existing oil and newly injected treatment fluids. This study solves that evaluation gap by combining conductivity testing with NMR-based fluid-occupancy measurements, allowing proppant blends to be ranked for both flow capacity and oil mobility.
Application Area
Shale-oil refracturing; proppant blend and mesh-size selection; oil-water displacement in propped fractures; fracture conductivity testing; NMR-based fluid-occupancy evaluation; shut-in and flowback design.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Hydraulic fracturing

Fracture Propagation Behavior in Coal and Tight Sandstone Reservoirs - Experimental Insights from True Triaxial Physical Simulation

This study compares hydraulic-fracture growth in medium-deep coal, deep coal, and deep tight sandstone using true triaxial tests on 100 mm cubic specimens. Injection rate and fracturing-fluid viscosity were varied under controlled stress conditions. Pre- and post-fracturing CT scans, 3D reconstruction, and two-dimensional fractal-dimension analysis were used to characterize breakdown behavior, fracture branching, and network complexity.

The experiments show that treatment response is strongly reservoir dependent. Medium-deep coal develops increasingly complex fractures as injection rate and viscosity increase. Deep coal reaches maximum complexity at intermediate rate and viscosity, while values that are too low or too high produce simpler geometries. Deep tight sandstone shows a similar intermediate optimum. The fractal results agree with CT-based reconstructions and provide a quantitative basis for selecting reservoir-specific pumping parameters.

ARMA 26-0074, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0074
Technical Problem Solved
Hydraulic-fracturing schedules are frequently transferred between lithologies without adequately accounting for differences in rock fabric, natural fractures, and stress confinement. This work establishes a controlled comparative dataset that identifies how injection rate and fluid viscosity should be adjusted for different coal and tight-sandstone reservoir conditions.
Application Area
Hydraulic-fracturing design for coalbed methane, deep coal, and tight sandstone; pumping-rate and viscosity optimization; fracture-network complexity evaluation; CT-based laboratory simulation; reservoir-specific stimulation design.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Reservoir characterization

Integrated NMR-PDP-Micro-CT Evaluation of Imbibition-Induced Oil Mobilization, Permeability Response, and Structural Evolution in Shale Oil Reservoirs

This paper presents an integrated workflow for evaluating the benefits and risks of shut-in imbibition in shale-oil reservoirs. Core samples from the Dongyuemiao Member and Lianggaoshan Formation were studied using NMR T2 spectroscopy, pulse-decay permeability testing, and micro-CT imaging. The combined measurements track apparent pore-scale oil mobilization, dry-state permeability response, and representative pore or fracture structural changes before and after imbibition.

Both tested imbibition agents improve oil recovery, with a clear response near 0.10% concentration. Agent 2 performs better than Agent 1, particularly in Lianggaoshan shale. NMR results show limited mobilization from the finest pores, while micro-CT indicates stronger weak-plane opening and microfracture connectivity in Lianggaoshan shale. Most shale samples show apparent permeability enhancement, whereas sandstone and limestone exhibit moderate attenuation. The workflow supports lithology-specific shut-in and flowback optimization.

ARMA 26-0057, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0057
Technical Problem Solved
Imbibition recovery and formation damage are commonly evaluated in separate experiments, making it difficult to understand the coupled relationship among oil mobilization, liquid retention, permeability change, and structural response. This study integrates NMR, PDP, and micro-CT so that beneficial displacement and adverse damage mechanisms can be assessed within one workflow.
Application Area
Shale-oil shut-in design; imbibition-agent screening; flowback optimization; formation-damage evaluation; pore-scale fluid-migration analysis; NMR, pulse-decay permeability, and micro-CT core studies.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Reservoir engineering

Inter-Well Connectivity Modeling in Naturally Fractured Tight Sandstone Formations Using Pressure Interference Tests

This paper develops a practical method for quantifying dynamic inter-well connectivity in naturally fractured tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Using the Keshen Gas Field as the study area, pressure interference-test responses and lag-time interpretation are combined with a U-tube pressure-communication analogy. Corrected bottom-hole flowing-pressure data from paired wells are analyzed using production-pressure correlation coefficients before and after operating changes at the stimulation well.

Applications in the Keshen 8, Keshen 13, and Keshen 24 blocks show that higher pressure-correlation coefficients generally correspond to shorter interference lag times and stronger hydraulic connectivity. A field-calibrated classification system is then applied to water-invaded wells in the Keshen 10 block. The resulting connectivity classes support targeted decisions for refracturing, proppant-based water control, fracture plugging, drainage diversion, and enhanced drainage.

ARMA 26-0685, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0685
Technical Problem Solved
Static connectivity models may not represent the current reservoir state, while conventional interference testing can require shut-ins and specialized monitoring. This study provides a field-calibrated method that uses routine production-pressure data to quantify relative well-to-well communication and link connectivity classes directly to water-control and stimulation decisions.
Application Area
Inter-well connectivity surveillance; naturally fractured tight-gas reservoirs; pressure-interference interpretation; water-invasion management; refracturing candidate selection; fracture plugging and drainage strategy design.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Hydraulic fracturing

Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Damage Fracturing Fluids for Ultra-Deep Coal-Bearing Gas Reservoirs in the Tarim Basin

This study screens and optimizes low-damage fracturing fluids for ultra-deep coal-bearing gas reservoirs in the Kuche Depression of the Tarim Basin. The target reservoirs combine approximately 115 C temperature, high in-situ stress, strong water sensitivity, and micro-nano pore systems. A total of 23 fluid systems - eight guar-based and fifteen slickwater formulations - were evaluated using rheological testing, gel-breaking and residue analysis, and core-damage experiments.

Guar-based fluids generally maintain higher post-shear viscosity, but they also generate more residue and greater formation damage. Selected slickwater systems provide better cleanup and damage control. The preferred weakly crosslinked system, S2, balances transport performance, breaking behavior, residue control, and permeability protection. Its recommended formulation is 0.40% drag reducer, 0.20% multifunctional additive, 0.10% crosslinker, and 0.0025% ammonium persulfate breaker.

ARMA 26-0195, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0195
Technical Problem Solved
High-temperature, water-sensitive coal-bearing reservoirs need fluids that can transport proppant without leaving excessive polymer residue or causing severe pore-throat damage. This study resolves the trade-off between rheological performance and cleanup by comparing guar and slickwater systems through an integrated rheology, residue, and core-damage workflow.
Application Area
Fracturing-fluid formulation and screening; ultra-deep coal-bearing gas reservoirs; high-temperature slickwater design; gel-breaker optimization; residue control; formation-damage mitigation; proppant-transport support.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Reservoir characterization

Pore-Permeability Anisotropy and Permeability Enhancement Mechanism Controlled by Shale Bedding - Insights from CT Characterization and Porosity-Permeability Testing of Core Samples from the Fuling Shale Gas Reservoir

This study quantifies how shale bedding controls directional porosity and permeability in core samples from the Fuling shale gas reservoir. Plugs were prepared parallel and perpendicular to bedding and tested over multiple confining-pressure conditions. High-resolution CT scanning and 3D reconstruction were used to characterize bedding occurrence, continuity, and density.

Porosity shows limited directional difference, but permeability exhibits strong interval- and stress-dependent anisotropy. Where bedding remains open and hydraulically connected, permeability parallel to bedding is distinctly higher than cross-bedding permeability. Quantitative CT analysis shows that horizontal permeability tends to increase with bedding count, while vertical permeability tends to decrease as bedding density rises. The results confirm the dual role of bedding as a preferential pathway for along-bedding flow and a barrier to cross-bedding flow, with anisotropy becoming more important under elevated stress.

ARMA 26-0060, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0060
Technical Problem Solved
Porosity alone and isotropic permeability assumptions cannot explain the directional, stress-sensitive flow behavior of bedded shale. This work integrates CT-based bedding characterization with directional permeability testing to identify when bedding enhances lateral flow, restricts vertical flow, and changes hydraulic effectiveness under confining stress.
Application Area
Shale reservoir characterization; anisotropic permeability modeling; hydraulic-fracture orientation and cross-bedding communication; stimulated-reservoir-volume design; stress-sensitive flow analysis; Fuling shale gas development.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Reservoir characterization

Pore-Permeability Anisotropy and Permeability Enhancement Mechanism Controlled by Shale Bedding - Insights from CT Characterization and Porosity-Permeability Testing of Core Samples from the Fuling Shale Gas Reservoir

This study quantifies how shale bedding controls directional porosity and permeability in core samples from the Fuling shale gas reservoir. Plugs were prepared parallel and perpendicular to bedding and tested over multiple confining-pressure conditions. High-resolution CT scanning and 3D reconstruction were used to characterize bedding occurrence, continuity, and density.

Porosity shows limited directional difference, but permeability exhibits strong interval- and stress-dependent anisotropy. Where bedding remains open and hydraulically connected, permeability parallel to bedding is distinctly higher than cross-bedding permeability. Quantitative CT analysis shows that horizontal permeability tends to increase with bedding count, while vertical permeability tends to decrease as bedding density rises. The results confirm the dual role of bedding as a preferential pathway for along-bedding flow and a barrier to cross-bedding flow, with anisotropy becoming more important under elevated stress.

ARMA 26-0060, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0060
Technical Problem Solved
Porosity alone and isotropic permeability assumptions cannot explain the directional, stress-sensitive flow behavior of bedded shale. This work integrates CT-based bedding characterization with directional permeability testing to identify when bedding enhances lateral flow, restricts vertical flow, and changes hydraulic effectiveness under confining stress.
Application Area
Shale reservoir characterization; anisotropic permeability modeling; hydraulic-fracture orientation and cross-bedding communication; stimulated-reservoir-volume design; stress-sensitive flow analysis; Fuling shale gas development.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Hydraulic fracturing

Experimental Study and Modeling of Proppant Entry Capability in Ultra-Deep Fractured Tight Sandstone Reservoirs

This paper develops an experimental and modeling framework for evaluating whether proppant can enter narrow natural-fracture branches in ultra-deep tight sandstone. A laboratory fracture-network apparatus with controlled branch apertures was designed around the 1/3 bridging concept. Four proppant size classes - 30/50, 40/70, 70/140, and 100/200 mesh - were tested over different fracture widths and blending ratios.

Entry performance is quantified using proppant entry efficiency and effective supported area. The results show that entry capability decreases exponentially as the particle-diameter-to-fracture-width ratio, d/w, increases. A transition zone marks the onset of bridging-dominated restriction. An empirical-mechanistic model is proposed to predict entry capacity and in-fracture particle count from the size-width ratio. The framework provides a screening tool for mesh selection, staged fine-to-coarse pumping, and placement optimization in narrow fracture networks.

ARMA 26-0062, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0062
Technical Problem Solved
Field proppant design lacks a direct quantitative metric linking particle size and local fracture aperture to branch entry, bridging, and effective support. This study creates measurable entry-efficiency parameters and a d/w-based predictive correlation for screening accessible fracture-width classes and selecting proppant sequences.
Application Area
Ultra-deep tight-sandstone stimulation; natural-fracture support; proppant mesh screening; bridge-risk assessment; microproppant and fine-to-coarse sequencing; fracture-network placement design.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Hydraulic fracturing

Experimental and Modeling Study on Fracture Conductivity Considering Proppant Placement Morphology in Multi-Branch Fracture Systems

This study links nonuniform proppant placement to post-placement fracture conductivity in a transparent multi-branch fishbone-fracture system. The apparatus visualizes particle migration, settling, branch-wise deposition, and fine-coarse segregation under controlled pumping schedules. Branch-inlet pressures are monitored during placement to track deposition-driven flow redistribution.

After the proppant settles, apparent conductivity is measured under proppant-free slickwater flow using target-branch pressure and outlet flow rate. Two equivalent geometries are applied: rectangular planar flow and semi-circular radial flow. The radial method produces higher absolute conductivity values, but both methods preserve the same rankings across pumping designs. Image-based placement footprints and particle-size partitioning show that similar total deposited areas can still produce large conductivity differences when fine and coarse particles segregate differently. The workflow supports conductivity ranking based on actual placement morphology rather than an ideal uniform pack.

ARMA 26-0063, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0063
Technical Problem Solved
Uniform proppant-pack and planar-flow assumptions can misrepresent the hydraulic capacity of branching fractures with settling, channeling, and particle-size segregation. This study integrates pressure monitoring, image-based morphology, particle-size partitioning, and geometry-sensitive conductivity calculations to evaluate nonuniform multi-branch placement.
Application Area
Multi-branch hydraulic-fracture design; pumping-schedule comparison; proppant blend optimization; branch-wise conductivity ranking; placement imaging and diagnostics; equivalent-flow modeling for discontinuous proppant footprints.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)

Geomechanics

Mechanical Anisotropy of Shale Oil Reservoir Rocks - Experimental Characterization and Insights from Multiscale Rock Mechanics Testing

This paper characterizes the directional mechanical behavior of shale-oil reservoir rocks from the Chang 6, Chang 71, and Chang 72 intervals in the Ordos Basin. The experimental program combines CT screening, XRD mineral analysis, ultrasonic velocity testing, triaxial compression, Brazilian tensile testing, semi-circular bend testing, and micro-indentation. Samples are prepared parallel and perpendicular to the bedding-related structural direction.

The results show clear stratigraphic and directional differences in dynamic and static elastic parameters, compressive strength, tensile strength, and fracture toughness. Dynamic modulus is generally higher than static modulus, but the conversion relationship varies by interval and orientation. The rocks therefore cannot be represented by one isotropic parameter set or one universal dynamic-to-static conversion. Macro-scale fracture toughness and micro-scale indentation response also do not show a simple one-to-one relationship, confirming the importance of scale effects.

ARMA 26-0065, presented at the 60th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, June 21-24, 2026.

Patent or Publication Number
ARMA 26-0065
Technical Problem Solved
Isotropic mechanical models and fixed dynamic-to-static conversion factors can misrepresent layered shale-oil rocks. In addition, a single fracture-resistance test does not capture scale-dependent behavior. This study provides interval-specific and direction-specific laboratory data across elastic, strength, and fracture-toughness measurements at multiple scales.
Application Area
Anisotropic geomechanical modeling; mechanical stratification; hydraulic-fracture initiation and propagation design; wellbore stability; dynamic-to-static parameter calibration; brittleness and fracture-toughness evaluation.
Public summaryConference paper (ARMA 2026)